Introduction

As AI reshapes industries, its impact on decision-making raises important ethical questions. From hiring to employee engagement, AI promises to make processes more efficient, and data driven. However, it also brings concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability. In the next roundtable, we’ll explore key ethical challenges surrounding AI in HR and how we can address them to ensure that AI serves as a force for good.

The Promise of AI in the HR Context

AI is revolutionizing HR processes by automating traditionally burdensome and time-consuming manual tasks including resume screening, employee engagement, and talent management. With increasing capability to rapidly analyze vast datasets, AI massively improves efficiency of HR-related decision making.

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has ushered in a new era of technological capabilities, but it has also brought forth a complex web of ethical challenges. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, from healthcare diagnostics to financial decision-making, fairness-related concerns about transparency, accountability, bias, discrimination, and privacy have come to the fore.

1. Transparency and Accountability

Many AI systems, especially those using deep learning and neural networks, operate as "black boxes," making their decision-making processes opaque. This opacity stems from several factors:

• The complexity of neural networks with millions of interconnected nodes.
• Emergent behaviors developed as AI learns from vast datasets.
• Non-linear decision processes that complicate input-output relationships.
• Lack of interpretability in internal representations and feature extractions.
• Dynamic learning that continuously adapts the system.

These characteristics make it challenging to trace the exact reasoning behind AI decisions, even when results are accurate. This lack of transparency raises concerns about accountability, bias, and trust, particularly in high-stakes applications like HR, healthcare diagnostics or financial decision-making.

Consequently, there's a growing focus on developing explainable AI (XAI) techniques and implementing transparency measures to address these challenges and make AI systems more understandable and trustworthy.

In Europe, the “right to explanation” of the GDPR has addressed transparency concerns in law, which are expanded on by the EU AI Act. Individuals must receive "meaningful information about the logic involved" in automated decisions affecting their legal rights or situation. This is especially important in the HR context, where AI decisions can lead to gaining or losing employment.

2. Bias and Discrimination

AI has revealed not only its human-like ability to make decisions, but also its equally human-like ability to base decisions on unfair biases and discrimination against legally protected groups. For example, a 2024 University of Washington study found large language models favored white-associated names in 85% of resume rankings and never preferred Black male candidates over white counterparts. See: AI tools show biases in ranking job applicants’ names according to perceived race and gender | UW News

The Dangerous Feedback Loop in AI

AI-driven tools often learn from historical data, which can reinforce and amplify biases present in that data, leading to systematic algorithmic bias. If the training data contains biases, AI can perpetuate unfair patterns, especially in hiring decisions. This highlights the importance of ongoing audits and human oversight to identify and correct these issues. Examples of this are notable in the talent screening and facial recognition context.

Learn in detail about algorithmic bias from MeVitae Algorithmic Bias Explained | MeVitae Blog

Biased Screening

AI recruitment tools like Amazon's disbanded resume screener (2018) inherited gender discrimination by training on a decade of male-dominated engineering applications, systematically downgrading resumes with terms like "women's chess club captain". See: Insight - Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women | Reuters

More recently, Workday’s AI screening tools led to a high-profile lawsuit due to alleged discrimination race, age, and disability by rejecting a disabled plaintiff’s applications for over 100 roles despite his qualifications. See: Workday must face novel bias lawsuit over AI screening software | Reuters

Facial Recognition Bias

Error rates for AI facial recognition software have been much higher for dark-skinned people and women than for white males, with error rates as high as 34.7% for dark-skinned women compared to 0.8% for light-skinned men.

These errors have life-changing consequences for innocent people erroneously identified and arrested in the law-enforcement context. This has led some cities such as Boston and San Francisco to ban police facial recognition altogether, despite its potential for apprehending genuine suspects where it works correctly. See: San Francisco Bans Agency Use of Facial Recognition Tech | WIRED and Boston Lawmakers Vote To Ban Use Of Facial Recognition Technology By The City : Updates: The Fight Against Racial Injustice : NPR.

The imbalance has partly been due to lack of diverse data sets to train facial recognition algorithms on. Fortunately, IBM and Microsoft have already reduced error rates by 10x (2018–2024) through dataset diversification.

3. Data Privacy, Consent & Disclosure

In addition to the issues above, AI raises myriad issues related to data privacy, consent and disclosure. AI-powered technologies enable pervasive monitoring and effortless data collection, with enormous potential for infringing on privacy rights.

AI often accesses personal data without users' full understanding or consent. Obtaining truly informed consent for AI processing is complex, especially for future, unpredictable uses, such as use of data to train large language models (LLMs). California’s recently passed AI bill, for example, mandates explicit disclosure of AI-driven decisions at the point of data collection, prohibiting retroactive application of AI to previously gathered information without renewed consent. See: California advances landmark legislation to regulate large AI models | AP News.

Moreover, large volumes of sensitive data used in AI increases the risk of security vulnerabilities and breaches. Many sources have observed a major increase in data breaches by users of AI diagnostic tools such as healthcare organizations.

4. Workers' Rights & Job Displacement

More generally, the integration of AI in the workplace has ignited long-held concerns about workers' rights and job displacement. According to several sources, by 2030, an estimated 14% of the global workforce may be forced to change careers due to AI, with 375 million jobs potentially at risk. See: Retraining and reskilling workers in the age of automation | McKinsey.

While AI promises increased efficiency and innovation, it also raises issues of discrimination, privacy invasion, and unfair dismissals. However, the impact of AI on employment is not uniform across sectors or regions, with advanced economies facing higher risks of job displacement. As AI continues to reshape the workplace, policymakers and employers must balance technological advancement with safeguarding workers' rights, ensuring transparency, and providing support for those affected by the AI revolution.

Legal Developments

The global legal landscape for AI use in HR is undergoing significant changes, particularly with the EU's rigorous Artificial Intelligence Act, which came into effect in August 2024 and will become fully effective by August 2026. This Act categorizes AI systems used in recruitment, performance evaluation, and employee management as high-risk, mandating strict transparency, human oversight, and data protection measures to prevent discrimination and ensure fairness. See: EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence | Topics | European Parliament.

The EU’s transformative legislation has been praised for its comprehensive approach to ensuring AI safety, transparency, and ethical use. However, concerns have been raised about potential impacts on innovation and competitiveness. The phased implementation, starting with bans on high-risk AI systems in February 2025, has given businesses time to adapt. 

In contrast, the UK has adopted a principles-based approach, relying on existing laws like the Equality Act and GDPR to regulate AI in employment contexts.

The U.S. has taken a more state-by-state and issue-specific approach, with an increasing number of states implementing laws to enhance transparency and reduce bias, while the federal government’s attitude has shifted since the new Trump administration, which is ostensibly more lax about AI fairness and responsible AI than the Biden administration.

As AI becomes integral to HR processes, companies must stay up-to-date and informed and learn to navigate these evolving legal frameworks to ensure compliance and ethical use of AI technologies.

Initial Steps to Improve Ethical AI in HR

• Develop AI Ethics Guidelines: Create ethical guidelines for using AI in HR, ensuring fairness and transparency in decision-making.
• Hybrid Decision Models: Ensure continued human oversight and participation in decision making.
• Regular Audits & Transparency: Regularly audit AI systems to identify and address biases and maintain transparency.
• Stakeholder Involvement: Involve diverse perspectives in AI development to ensure inclusive and fair outcomes.

Further Reading

• European Commission’s Q&A on Artificial Intelligence - QANDA_21_1683_EN.pdf provides background to the EU AI Act and the ethical concerns the Act addresses.
• The Ethics of AI in Human Resources | Ethics and Information Technology - Springer.
• Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare - PMC
• Algorithmic Bias Explained | MeVitae Blog

Make ethical AI part of your strategy. Reach out today to see how we can support you